Originality and topicality can only be established in the light of recent authoritative research. Although using pure CBD does not result in THC-like intoxication, it is not risk-free. For detailed guidelines see COPE's Ethical guidelines for reviewers and Wiley's Best Practice Guidelines on Publishing Ethics. Do the keywords accurately reflect the content? Modified on: Tue, 10 Dec, 2019 at 11:12 PM. A poor abstract can then lose the reader's interest and undo the benefit of an effective title - whilst the paper's abstract may appear in search results, the potential reader may go no further. You may be asked to revise your manuscript slightly or to perform a . 7 The first evaluations of import tolerances under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 which fully entered into force on 1.9.2008. A full read-through will also make sure that any initial concerns are indeed correct and fair. [CDATA[// > If unprocessed data are unavailable, manuscript evaluation may be stalled until the issue is . Ritardo Rogito Per Colpa Banca, Don't worry about all these. These are used to make sure observed trends are not due to chance and that the same experiment could be repeated by other researchers - and result in the same outcome. 1 Answer to this question Answer: Usually the status "Under review" indicates that the paper has cleared the admin check and it has been sent to the external peer reviewer or in-house section editor. Are there certain aspects that could be communicated better, such as parts of the discussion? If not, what would be required to make their case credible? What can reviewers do to help? Answered by Shailendra Shakya (Editor feedback). All individuals with an estimated probability of 0.5 or greater using the predictive models were classified as having OSA. diensthost wpnuserservice. Editor/associate-editor after preliminary evaluation of your manuscript invited some of the reviewers but non of them give positive response. You should also consider whether there is any in-built bias not nullified by the control experiments. Xian Yang, Pandeng Wang, Bowen Xiao, Qianna Xu, Qiang Guo, Shao-peng Li, Lulu Guo, Meifeng Deng, Jianbo Lu, Lingli Liu, Keping Ma, Bernhard Schmid, Lin Jiang. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? This article is written based on research that answers the question of how good the MBTI is to prove leadership . Its effect appears in real part of ac conductivity also. PIs gone AWOL? Rt 395 in ct 1 . Thank you Mr. Tong Wu for your generous advice. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. has been the leading causes of dentin hypersensitivity. After I had gone through the Summa and noted each place where it quoted a Pauline text, Alan Mostrom took my handwritten notes and turned them into a Word document with helpful tabulations. Another case would be the conflict of interest. The structure of the review report varies between journals. Based on the Advanced Functional Materials Review Speed Feedback System, it takes publisher 97.00 days to publish manuscript from receiving manuscript. It happened to me, hence saying. Introduction. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Any kind of suggestions is appreciated. A manuscript's progression from submission to decision Wileyunder consideration . Editors say, "If a manuscript has many English language and editing issues, please do not try and fix it. The immunization status of children is dependent on the dynamics of vaccination uptake which is complex and involves the interplay of different associated factors. Depending on the reviewers, a manuscript will be returned to the author(s) for revision or considered unsuitable. 5. Communicate more effectively with this specially curated collection of easy templates and expert tips for 10+ situations when . [CDATA[// >